Discrete Opamp

//Discrete Opamp
Discrete Opamp2018-12-19T16:18:17+00:00

What’s Right About Discrete Circuits


Discrete circuits are custom built by Burson for specific applications rather than an op-amp’s jack-of-all-trades-master-of-none specifications. The art of circuit design yields superior sound in every way in comparison to simple plug-a-chip engineering.

A system can only sound as good as its weakest link. All our products use thick, quality, temperature-stable printed circuit boards with high-purity copper traces and gold-plated soldering pads. And extra coating is applied to both sides of the PCB preventing oxidation. The boards are hand-built use high-spec metal-film resistors and other audio-grade parts using as few hand-matched components in the signal path as possible.


Less is more graphic

  • Custom circuitry depending on application
  • Significantly reduces component count to better preserve signal integrity
  • Component are top-quality audio-grade components
  • 1%-matched metal-film resistors and silver mica capacitors
  • Extremely temperature stable
  • Each transistor is chemically optimized for its application: NPN or PNP
  • Each transistor tested and matched before hand-soldering onto the PCB

What’s So Entirely Wrong With IC Op-Amps

Component_ListsThere is a common misconception among audiophiles: That is an Integrated Operational Amplifier (IC Opamp) is equivalent or even superior to a discrete design. Nothing can be further from the truth! Restricted by the fabrication process and technological limitation an IC Opamp is an inferior substitute for a proper discrete design. An IC Opamp is entirely constructed on a single dice of silicon waver, which is smaller than a grain of rice. Limited by its size and heat dispersion, it is impossible to incorporate a top quality audio transistor like the A970, or K170 which feature in the Burson Audio discrete design. During the construction of a discrete transistor a chemical optimisation process take place for each pieces of silicon according to there application (NPN or PNP). This optimisation process is critical to the performance of the final product. Some of the benefit included:

optimized for breakdown voltage and performance

optimized for near-true complementary

But this process can not take place on an intergraded circuit since all transistors is fabricated on the same piece of silicon. This is one of the major drawn back of an intergraded circuit compare to a discrete circuit.

All components on the silicone dice are formed by droplet of chemical (very much like inkjet printer printing on paper). This fabrication process can not create parts like the 1% tolerant metal film resistor, or the super stable silver mica capacitor (please see table above to compare how discrete parts are different to their intergraded substitute) Since they are all connected (hence integrated) they can not be individually tested and matched.


In an IC opamp the conductor layer that connects all the parts is formed by a layer of aluminium vapour that is thinner than the water vapour left on foggy windscreen. This poor conductor is the silent killer to musical texture.

The close proximity of components also poses a problem for audio signals, where that delicate signal that music lovers pursue, will be masked by EMI noise.

In the end, the consumer is getting an opamp that is built with a bunch of second grade parts that is unable to yield the best results, connected via a thin layer of aluminium foil.

An IC opamp is nothing more than a cost cutting substitute in audio application which we hate with a passion!


To learn more about the fabrication process of Intergraded Circuits please visit the following links:

“How Can We Create an Integrated Circuit from Sand?” Exploration 1B: Comparing Macroscopic and Microscopic Circuit Components by Melonie A. Teichert, Angelica M. Stacy, Alice C. Rico, Susan E. Kegley, Jennifer G. Loeser, Marco Molinaro, and Susan E. Walden. Applets programming by Cora Estrada and Toshiro Horie.Circuit images by Marco Molinaro, Susan Walden and Sue Whitmore.

(http://chemistry.beloit.edu/Chip/pages/macromic.html) “The History of the Integrated Circuit”

by Nobelprize .org (http://nobelprize.org/educational_games/physics/integrated_circuit/history/)

Reference: “Plasmas and Plasma-Surface Interactions” by Dr Paul May , University of

Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TS, UK “Integrated circuits” by Integrated Publishing, USA “Integrated circuit” Wikipedia, The free encyclopedia

And What’s Wrong With Class-D

Most modest footprint power amplifiers are class-D or variations like class-T or Z. Such designs are wholly inconsistent with Burson ideals on two counts. The first is our steadfast refusal to use IC-based audio building blocks as we’ve described above. The second is that class-D and class-T chips were created for the car audio industry and subsequently for mobile phones where power efficiency, size and budget are the driving design parameters so audio performance is secondary if that.

Instead of going with the flow, we refused to compromise and gave ourselves the difficult task of creating a class-D sized power amplifier with an IC-free class-A output stage with a custom transformer and a linear power supply. Burson’s wonderful-sounding Timekeeper amplifier successfully challenges the established beliefs about size vs. performance.

Class-A designs are simpler than other modes so there are a reduced number of components in the signal path that preserves the purity of the signal. The transistors in this design operate in the most linear portion of their transconductance curve hence deliver less distortion. Because the transistor is never ‘off’ there’s no “turn on” delay or problems with charge storage. And generally, class-A has better high-frequency performance and a stable feedback loop. Lastly, class-A doesn’t suffer the crossover distortion that’s associated with class-D designs.